宝马车4次碾压儿童到底是一种什么行为_金虎时评_车祸

宝马车4次碾压儿童到底是一种什么行为
http://news.nen.com.cn     2010-09-14 08:22     东北新闻网    网友评论  _COUNT_条
9月7日上午,在江苏省新沂市青年路良辰花苑小区,三岁半男童乐乐(化名)正在小区内玩耍,一辆宝马X6突然倒车将他撞倒,并从乐乐上半身碾过。令人惊愕的是,宝马车紧接着又反复三次碾轧乐乐,导致其惨死。当地警方事发后认为,肇事司机伍某与乐乐的家人之间无任何过节,因此伍某不存在“故意杀人”的动机,只是惊慌失措所致,伍某因涉嫌交通肇事罪被刑拘。(9月13日《扬子晚报》)
在如此令人痛心的悲剧面前,对肇事者的道德谴责已无太大意义,且让我们抛开“宝马”所代表的富人标签,从法律的角度看看肇事司机伍某该当何罪。
从新闻报道的细节看,伍某4次碾压乐乐,绝非惊慌失措所致。如果说他第一次倒车撞倒乐乐是失误,亦即交通肇事,那么后3次碾压则很有可能是故意为之,是在清醒意识支配下作出的选择——“碾伤不如碾死”。实际上,“碾伤不如碾死”已经成为一些肇事司机的“理性”选择,此前一些地方也出现过司机故意碾死受伤者的情况,其令人发指的行为都是受这一冷血逻辑驱使。
新沂市警方认为伍某并非“故意杀人”并以涉嫌交通肇事罪刑拘伍某,笔者不敢苟同。无任何过节并不意味着不能故意杀人,很多歹徒行凶都是残害无辜者,残害与他无冤无仇甚至根本不认识的人,难道这些歹徒都不是故意杀人?要知道,伍某在事发前或许与乐乐的家人之间无任何过节,但在撞倒乐乐之后,情况就已发生变化了。根据相关法律规定,所谓“故意杀人”是指“故意非法剥夺他人生命的行为”,伍某4次碾压乐乐致其死亡,其行为绝非简单的“惊慌失措”所能解释。而且令人不解的是,肇事司机“观察了一下血泊中的乐乐,未采取任何措施,随即离开现场。”根据相关司法解释,交通肇事罪在很多情形下可以转化为故意杀人罪,比如行为人交通肇事后,明知被害人已经重伤,若不及时抢救可能导致死亡,为逃避罪责,希望或放任被害人死亡,因而逃逸,致使被害人因抢救不及时而死亡,这种行为就应当按照《刑法》第232条以故意杀人罪论处。在最高人民法院2000年11月出台的《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》中明确规定,“行为人在交通肇事后为逃避法律追究,将被害人带离事故现场后隐藏或者遗弃,致使被害人无法得到救助而死亡或者严重残疾的”,应当分别以故意杀人罪或者故意伤害罪定罪处罚。
当然,笔者不是法官,伍某4次碾压乐乐是否出于故意,还须经过严格认定,其行为到底是交通肇事还是故意杀人或过失杀人,有待司法机关作出认定、法院作出公正判决。无论如何,民众绝不希望看到由于种种原因导致误判、轻判,从而变相鼓励更多肇事司机信奉“碾伤不如碾死”这一冷血逻辑。
(新华每日电讯 晏扬)
宝马四次碾童碾碎人性拷问法律
2010年09月14日 08:42:13   华龙网-重庆晨报
江苏新沂市三岁半男童乐乐（化名）在小区内玩耍时，一辆宝马X6突然倒车撞倒他，车左后轮从乐乐上半身碾过。宝马车紧接着又反复三次碾轧乐乐，导致其惨死。据录像资料显示，司机观察了一下血泊中的乐乐，未采取任何措施，随即离开现场。目前，肇事司机因涉嫌交通肇事罪被刑拘。对肇事司机进行血液抽查，发现其并不是酒驾。通过对肇事车辆进行检验、鉴定和评估，发现该车后视镜及倒车雷达影像均有效。（新闻详见本报今日13版）
当罪恶的车轮反复压向一个没有任何自卫能力的3岁孩童时，相信每一个稍有良知的公民都会感到心碎，生命在宝马车轮之下，原来如此不屑。宝马碾童事件，碾碎的不只是幼童的身体，同样碾碎了司机的人性，拷问着人们的道德底线，以及现行的交通法律法规。
也许人们还不曾淡忘轰动全国的张金柱事件，1997年8月24日，原郑州市公安局二七分局局长张金柱酒后驾车时将苏东海、苏磊父子撞翻，并把苏东海和两辆自行车拖挂车下狂奔1500米，年仅11岁的苏磊当场死亡，父亲苏东海重伤。此事被媒体报道后，民意的强烈反应，舆论界口诛笔伐，司法界激烈讨论，最终，案发5个月后，张金柱因犯故意伤害罪和交通肇事罪，被判死刑。
江苏宝马碾童事件经媒体报道后，同样引爆了各大网络论坛，在搜狐的新闻跟帖中，短短几个小时多达10万人发表评论，几乎一边倒地声讨宝马司机缺乏人性，缺乏基本的道德底线，应该受到严惩。甚至有江苏网友称：“为江苏有这样的人感到可耻”、“如果这种不判死刑的话，那死刑可以取消了”……
与张金柱案相比，碾童的宝马司机更为恶劣，事后查明，司机并非酒驾，车后视镜及倒车雷达影像均有效。我们当然不愿意用恶意的心态去猜度肇事司机此刻的内心，但这些细节和证据都表明，他事发当时的意识是清晰的，肇事车辆的性能是完好的，这样，反复碾压的动机似乎就很明显：担心碾伤幼童后留下长久后患，索性碾压致死，一次性赔钱了事。
真正让人感到可怕的并不是一起恶性交通事故，而是肇事司机的这种狂妄且冷漠的心理动机：碾伤不如碾死。道德沦丧，人性俱失，生命在权钱思维下变得苍白无力。从监控录像看，案发后，司机并未及时施救，而是大步流星的下车离开，可见并非交警事后推测的“惊慌失措所致”。
产生这种“碾伤不如碾死”的心理动机，在笔者看来，仍然跟交通肇事罪量刑过轻有关系，不是拿“仇富”说事，对有钱人来说，交通肇事的犯罪成本太低，不足以对司机造成巨大威慑，是不容争论的事实。
我国《刑法》第133条规定，违反交通运输管理法规，因而发生重大事故，致人重伤、死亡的，处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；交通运输肇事后逃逸或者有其他特别恶劣情节的，处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑。如果按照交通肇事罪来论处，宝马司机最重也只能判处七年有期徒刑。
在网友和读者中，讨论得最激烈的就是宝马司机的行为除了构成交通肇事罪，是否还构成故意伤害致人死亡罪或者故意杀人罪，如果成立，理应严惩缺乏人性和基本道德的肇事司机，相信法律会给民众一个公允的说法。
http://say.cqnews.net/plzl/201009/t20100914_4591781.htm
（文/王方杰）
BMW driver detained after running over 3-year-old child
By Wang Hongyi (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-09-14 08:01
Comments(0)PrintMail
LargeMediumSmall

SHANGHAI - A 3-year-old boy in Xinyi of Xuzhou in East China's Jiangsu province died under the wheels of a BMW, which ran over the boy four times in less than 30 seconds.
The BMW driver surnamed Wu has been detained for further investigation while the incident triggered an uproar among netizens.
The incident happened around 11 am on Sept 7 when the boy Le Le (not his real name) was playing behind a BMW X6 car in a residential community, the Nanjing-based Yangtze Evening News reported on Monday.
The driver drove the car backwards without looking behind the car and knocked down the boy, the report said.
"My son was run over four times," the boy's father surnamed Li was quoted as saying while crying and watching the surveillance video that happened to catch the entire accident.
The video shows that at 11:03:18, the upper half of the boy's body was hit by the car, knocking him down. The boys was on the ground, kicking his legs. The car stopped for a moment. At 11:03:30, the car ran over the boy's body for the first time with its left rear wheel. At 11:03:33, the driver drove ahead, so the boy was run over a second time. At 11:03:38, the driver stopped the car and got out, but later the empty car continued to roll backwards and its left rear wheel ran over the boy for the third time. At 11:03:44, the car's left front wheel ran over the boy for the fourth time.
Then, the driver saw the boy, who was lying in a pool of blood, and left the accident site without taking any rescue measures.
"The driver killed my son intentionally," Li was quoted by Yangtze Evening News as having said.
The BMW car was equipped with both rear-view mirrors and a radar that sounds a warning when the car, driving in reverse, nears an object.
The driver should have been able to see the boy, who was 1.16 meters tall, while driving the car, the report quoted Li as saying.
When the driver ran over the boy the first time, he should have gotten out to see what was happening, Li reportedly said.
An official at the publicity department of Xinyi Public Security Bureau, who declined to be identified, told China Daily on Monday that the BMW driver has been taken into custody.
"The only thing I can tell you is that the driver has been detained, and the real cause of the accident remains unclear," he said. "The investigation is still being carried by the police."
Alcohol tests showed the driver was not legally drunk at the time of the accident. And the accident site is smooth cement pavement and the visibility was also good, according to the Xinyi traffic police department.
The driver did not look behind his car before driving backwards, which was the direct reason for the accident, local traffic police said, according to the Yangtze Evening News.
The case drew public concerns immediately after it was reported. On news portal qq.com, more than 228,000 web users voted to express their anger toward the driver.
The topics of an online forum tieba.baidu.com also mainly focused on the case on Monday, and some netizens even posted the license plate number of the BMW vehicle.
Zhang Lingfei, the reporter of Yangtze Evening News who originally covered the story, told China Daily on Monday that the boy's father could not bear the sadness after he was interviewed by several reporters in the morning, forcing him to recall the memories repeatedly.
"He is so sad that he doesn't want to be disturbed any more," Zhang said.
Ding Jie contributed to this story.
China Daily
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2010-09/14/content_11297234.htm
(China Daily 09/14/2010 page3