学生网上批评教师 被关禁闭后状告学校

来源:百度文库 编辑:神马文学网 时间:2024/04/29 05:24:50
 Critical of Teacher Sues High School Over SuspensionBy David Kravets December 09, 2008 |原文网址:http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/12/us-student-inte.html

A former Florida high school student who was disciplined for "cyberbullying" a teacher on Facebook is suing the school principal on allegations of violating her free speech rights.

The case highlights the legal challenges facing courts and school administrators as they grapple with campus civil order and free expression in an online world.

"We're in the very first generation of this and there's nothing ripe for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear," said Frank LoMonte, executive director of the Virginia-based Student Press Law Center.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in a Florida federal court, concerns Katherine Evans, now 19, who was suspended as a senior last year after creating a Facebook group devoted to her English teacher. The group was called "Ms. Sarah Phelps is the worst teacher I've ever met!," and featured a photograph of the teacher, and an invitation for other students to "express your feelings of hatred."

After people's comments derided Evans for the online stunt, and expressed support for the teacher, she deleted the group. But Pembroke Pines Charter High School, which did not respond for comment, suspended Evans for three days for "disruptive behavior" and for "Bullying / Cyber Bullying Harassment towards a staff member," according to the lawsuit, which is backed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

Evans was removed from her from advanced placement classes "and forced her into the lesser-weighted honors classes." The lawsuit alleges the black mark on Evans' permanent record is "unjustifiably straining her academic reputation and good standing."

The lawsuit (.pdf) is one of about a dozen across the United States that are part of the fallout as schools confront cyberbullying and the explosion of social networking sites. A Texas high school volleyball coach in September went so far as to declare a ban on student Facebook and MySpace profiles, a decision the Northside Independent School District reversed (.pdf). Last month, Tennessee State University blocked the online gossip site JuicyCampus at the school firewall. In June, Missouri enacted a law against "cyberbullying" in the wake of the Megan Meier suicide tragedy, which was triggered by a hoax MySpace account.

Before the internet, student speech cases usually concerned student newspapers and dress codes.

There's no bright-line rule on what constitutes free, student speech in the online world. And as schools start to regulate off-campus student speech on the internet, lawsuits are following.

The U.S. Supreme Court has never addressed the parameters of online student speech, but might soon. So far, lower courts are following a 1969 high court ruling saying student speech is protected unless it is "substantially disruptive," though the road map provided by that decision is leading different judges to varying destinations. In that landmark case, the Supreme Court said students had a First Amendment right to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.

Generally, the courts have allowed the suppression of student speech, online or off, when it threatens bodily harm and advocates illegal activity, "none of which we have in Ms. Evans' case," said one of the teen's attorneys, Matthew D. Bavaro, of Plantation, Florida.

"She has the absolute First Amendment right to do this," Bavaro said. "The question is how far does the school's authority go to punish off-campus speech they don't like? If Katie had praised the teacher, would she have been punished? The school is judging what is appropriate speech."

But with the explosion of the internet and social networking sites, "The courts are figuring out where the boundaries end and start when it comes to off-campus speech," LoMonte said.

On Wednesday, the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, one court level below the Supreme Court, will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit similar to the Florida case filed Monday.

The appeal concerns Justin Layshock, who, as a senior and honors student at a Pennsylvania high school, was suspended for 10 days after creating a mock MySpace profile of his principal.

The profile said the principal took drugs and kept beer at his desk. A federal judge overturned the suspension, ruling last year that the fake profile was not created at school and did not create a "substantial disruption."

"Public schools are vital institutions, but their reach is not unlimited," U.S. District Judge Terrence McVerry of Pennsylvania ruled last year.

Hickory High School appealed.

According to Monday's lawsuit, Evans used no profanities and stated no threats against the teacher. The suspension notice from the public school alleged only that Evans "had posted an inappropriate site regarding her teacher on Facebook." Evans is demanding that the suspension be removed from her record.    学生网上批评教师 被关禁闭后状告学校
  cnBeta译自《连线》杂志
  一位佛罗里达高中生凯瑟琳·伊万斯因为在社交网站Facebook上"网络攻击"一位老师而受到关禁闭的处分, 近日她起诉学校侵犯了她自由表达观点的权力. 此案使校园维护秩序与自由言论之间的冲突再次浮出水面.
  当地学生法律机构的负责人Frank LoMonte认为, "我们是最先面对此类问题的, 最高法院也没有作出相关的判例可供借鉴."
  本案周一在佛罗里达一个地方法庭开庭审理. 现年19岁的凯瑟琳去年毕业之前创建了一个Facebook小组批评她的英语老师, 名为"萨拉女士是我遇到的最坏的老师", 放了老师的照片, 还有给其他同学的邀请, 希望他们"表达你们的憎恶之情". 可惜大家不买账, 不少人嘲笑凯瑟琳的举动, 而且表达了对老师的支持. 她决定删除这个小组, 但是她的高中没有听解释就关了她三天禁闭, 理由是"制造破坏行为"和"攻击/在线攻击并骚扰职员". 根据指控, 这一举动得到了美国民权联盟的支持.
  凯瑟琳被移出所谓的"尖子班"(advanced placement classes), "被强迫进入不那么重要的班级." 起诉书认为加在凯瑟琳身上的标记 "不公平的影响了她在学习方面的名誉和优秀成绩".
  凯瑟琳的案子(下载PDF格式的起诉书)是近年来美国出现的关于学生网络诽谤方面的诉讼中的一例(参见这份起诉书和这里). 在网络出现之前, 学生言论方面的纠纷主要是关于学生办的报纸和衣着规则. 对学生在网络世界的言论到底怎样才算适当并没有统一的认识, 随着学校对学生校外的言论加以整治, 诉讼也随之增多. 美国最高法院从来没有对学生网络言论设立过界限, 不过估计很快就会有. 目前低层法院在实践中主要根据1969年的一个判例, 说学生言论除非是"明显有破坏性的", 否则都将被保护, 不过具体执行过程中因为目的不同, 也会引出不一样的判决结果. 那个当年的判例支持学生使用宪法第一修正案赋予的权力带上黑色袖标抗议政府发动越战.
  一般来说, 对于威胁予以身体攻击和鼓动非法行为的言论, 法院不予支持. 但是学生的代理律师马修·D·巴法罗认为"伊万斯小姐的案子与上述任何一条都没有关系".
  "她拥有足够的第一修正案赋予的权力来做这件事, 问题是学校惩罚校外言论的权威到底大到何种程度? 假如她表扬了老师, 学校会惩罚她吗? 学校根本就是在自己裁判什么是合适的言论."
  但是, LoMonte只是说法庭"还在斟酌"校外言论的界限在哪里.
  周三, 美国的第三巡回上诉法院, 最高法院的直属机关, 将旁听另一起与本案类似的起诉的辩论环节. 这起案子中, 名为贾斯汀的一 位宾夕法尼亚高中生, 同时也是优秀学生, 因为在社交网站MySpace上建立了一个恶搞他们校长的个人资料页面被关了10天禁闭. 这个页面里他的校长吸毒, 桌边常摆着一杯啤酒. 一位法官推翻了去年所做的裁决, 当时认为此言论并非在校内创建, 且不构成"明显有破坏性的". 法官去年判决时说道: "学校确实是重要的公共场所, 但它的管辖范围是有限的."学校不服, 提出上诉.
  根据周一的起诉书称, 凯瑟琳没有使用亵渎性言语, 也没有直接威胁老师. 学校的处分却硬说成"在Facebook张贴了关于其老师的不合适站点". 凯瑟琳要求学校从她的档案里取消做出的处分决定.