神马文学网以伪科学来自欺欺人的经济学者 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
来源：百度文库 编辑：神马文学网 时间：2024/05/05 20:25:02
以伪科学来自欺欺人的经济学者
Posted on Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 3:20 pm
Arnold Kling：我为经济学同行的行为感到惊讶。标准的宏观经济学根本不管用。书上什么地方说“流动性偏好”需要财政部债券来满足了？什么地方说向银行系统注入资金是一种政策工具了？研究生程度的宏观经济学就更糟糕。那些用委托代理模型来求解欧拉方程的课程遭到抛弃了吗？那些教这些课程的教授被炒鱿鱼了吗？为什么还没有？当然，市场需要“强有力”的领袖和“强有力”的经济学家，而他们就是那些能够以智者形象愚弄公众的人，而以最能自欺者为甚
My main beef with economists is that standard macroeconomics does such a poor job of describing what is going on. The textbooks models are pretty much useless. Where in the textbooks is "liquidity preference" a demand for Treasury securities? Where in the textbooks does it say that injecting capital into banks is a policy tool?
Graduate macro is even worse. Have the courses that use representative-agent models solving Euler equations been abolished? Have the professors teaching those courses been fired? Why not?
I have always thought that the issue of the relationship between financial markets and the "real economy" was really deep. I thought that it was a critical part of macroeconomic theory that was poorly developed. But the economics profession for the past thirty years instead focused on producing stochastic calculus porn to satisfy young men's urge for mathematical masturbation.
Economists ought to admit that we do not know much about what is going on today. Neither do the Fed Chairman and the Treasury Secretary. Of course, the market demand is for "strong" leaders and for "strong" economists, who can fool the public into believing that they have great knowledge. The ones who do this best are those who have fooled themselves.
Posted on Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 3:20 pm
Arnold Kling：我为经济学同行的行为感到惊讶。标准的宏观经济学根本不管用。书上什么地方说“流动性偏好”需要财政部债券来满足了？什么地方说向银行系统注入资金是一种政策工具了？研究生程度的宏观经济学就更糟糕。那些用委托代理模型来求解欧拉方程的课程遭到抛弃了吗？那些教这些课程的教授被炒鱿鱼了吗？为什么还没有？当然，市场需要“强有力”的领袖和“强有力”的经济学家，而他们就是那些能够以智者形象愚弄公众的人，而以最能自欺者为甚My main beef with economists is that standard macroeconomics does such a poor job of describing what is going on. The textbooks models are pretty much useless. Where in the textbooks is "liquidity preference" a demand for Treasury securities? Where in the textbooks does it say that injecting capital into banks is a policy tool?
Graduate macro is even worse. Have the courses that use representative-agent models solving Euler equations been abolished? Have the professors teaching those courses been fired? Why not?
I have always thought that the issue of the relationship between financial markets and the "real economy" was really deep. I thought that it was a critical part of macroeconomic theory that was poorly developed. But the economics profession for the past thirty years instead focused on producing stochastic calculus porn to satisfy young men's urge for mathematical masturbation.
Economists ought to admit that we do not know much about what is going on today. Neither do the Fed Chairman and the Treasury Secretary. Of course, the market demand is for "strong" leaders and for "strong" economists, who can fool the public into believing that they have great knowledge. The ones who do this best are those who have fooled themselves.
以伪科学来自欺欺人的经济学者 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
压低人民币汇率等于供养美国 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
财产权利面面观 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
民主不是自由 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
高人权才有高增长 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
市场经济的优势就是缩小贫富分化 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
政府卖地消除楼市泡沫 : 薛兆丰 新制度主义时代
见习制度：新时代的“上山下乡”？
新自由主义时代经济增长的矛盾
学者：和平谈判已属自欺欺人 南海问题需以战求和
学者：和平谈判已属自欺欺人 南海问题需以战求和
互联网2.0时代来临——论个性主义的经济、社会和思想基础
何俊志：新制度主义政治学的流派划分与分析走向
中国为何要以“制度建设”替代“GDP主义”
中国为何要以“制度建设”替代“GDP主义”
中国为何要以“制度建设”替代“GDP主义”
中国为何要以“制度建设”替代“GDP主义”
学者：南海问题需以战求和 和平谈判已属自欺欺人//南海问题不能国际化和“中美化”
新制度主义政治学中国化研究及其启示
新制度主义政治学中国化研究及其启示2
新时代来了新的赚钱方法也来了(网络赚钱)
互联网2.0时代来临——论个性主义的经济、社会和思想基础 | 博客网
玄幻文学:时代的犬儒主义
论消费主义时代的精神生产