欧洲历史
来源:百度文库 编辑:神马文学网 时间:2024/04/28 02:37:20
Europe, viewed from across the Atlantic, is often looked on as a depressing place-not so much the old continent as the dark continent: economically stuck, politically and morally confused, militarily feeble and populated most visibly by pensioners, trade-unionists, anti-Semites and terrorists.
By looking at how much Europe has achieved over the past 50 years William Hitchcock is able to take a view of the continent that is fundamentally and appropriately optimistic. Starting his narrative with a compelling portrait of a wrecked and divided continent in 1945, he makes clear that the dominant themes of the next half century were the establishment of peace, remarkable economic recovery and an ultimately successful struggle against communism. The fact that this comprehensive and nuanced history should be the work of an American historian is also worth remembering in a time of transatlantic tension. It is important to be reminded that there is a deep fund of mutual knowledge and sympathy on both sides of the Atlantic. Long survey histories, covering 50 years and numerous countries, can be difficult books both to write and to read. For anyone unfamiliar with the period they risk turning into a blizzard of undifferentiated facts. There is a danger that they will simply be a rehearsal of well-known events, without adding anything really new. Mr Hitchcock is careful to avoid both pitfalls. He finds a convincing pattern in his material by imposing four themes on his chronology: the aftermath of war; economic boom in the 1950s and 1960s; rebellion in the 1960s and 1970s, covering everything from the Red Brigades in Italy to the democratic revolutions in Spain and Portugal; and unity for the last two decades of the century, covering the fall of communism and the deepening of European integration. As with most survey histories, it is possible to dip in and out of sections of Mr Hitchcock's book—to read the chapters on European integration, for example, but to skip those on decolonisation or the Soviet Union. But the reader who adopts this strategy would be missing something. It is part of the skill of the book that each section throws a light on the others. France's post-war embrace of Germany and European political integration, makes much more sense when understood against the backdrop of the debacle of decolonisation in Algeria and Indochina in the 1950s. The determination and energy with which the Germans set about creating their economic miracle is better understood against the background of the grim events on the other side of the iron curtain.
By looking at how much Europe has achieved over the past 50 years William Hitchcock is able to take a view of the continent that is fundamentally and appropriately optimistic. Starting his narrative with a compelling portrait of a wrecked and divided continent in 1945, he makes clear that the dominant themes of the next half century were the establishment of peace, remarkable economic recovery and an ultimately successful struggle against communism. The fact that this comprehensive and nuanced history should be the work of an American historian is also worth remembering in a time of transatlantic tension. It is important to be reminded that there is a deep fund of mutual knowledge and sympathy on both sides of the Atlantic. Long survey histories, covering 50 years and numerous countries, can be difficult books both to write and to read. For anyone unfamiliar with the period they risk turning into a blizzard of undifferentiated facts. There is a danger that they will simply be a rehearsal of well-known events, without adding anything really new. Mr Hitchcock is careful to avoid both pitfalls. He finds a convincing pattern in his material by imposing four themes on his chronology: the aftermath of war; economic boom in the 1950s and 1960s; rebellion in the 1960s and 1970s, covering everything from the Red Brigades in Italy to the democratic revolutions in Spain and Portugal; and unity for the last two decades of the century, covering the fall of communism and the deepening of European integration. As with most survey histories, it is possible to dip in and out of sections of Mr Hitchcock's book—to read the chapters on European integration, for example, but to skip those on decolonisation or the Soviet Union. But the reader who adopts this strategy would be missing something. It is part of the skill of the book that each section throws a light on the others. France's post-war embrace of Germany and European political integration, makes much more sense when understood against the backdrop of the debacle of decolonisation in Algeria and Indochina in the 1950s. The determination and energy with which the Germans set about creating their economic miracle is better understood against the background of the grim events on the other side of the iron curtain.
欧洲历史
欧洲历史
欧洲瓷器历史展观感
组图:去欧洲追寻奶酪的历史
哪个皇帝曾经改变欧洲历史
哪个皇帝曾经改变欧洲历史
毁掉拿破仑帝国--莫斯科大火改写欧洲历史(图)
中国和欧洲历史的“封建”概念的异同
论全球化、欧洲中心论与普遍历史
改变欧洲历史的匈奴民族之最终命运
//////改变欧洲历史的匈奴民族之最终命运
//////改变欧洲历史的匈奴民族之最终命运
论全球化、欧洲中心论与普遍历史
中国历史朝代和欧洲历史朝代对应表
中国历史朝代和欧洲历史朝代对应表
欧洲历史格局变迁和欧盟的统一思想
改写欧洲历史的两位中国皇帝
欧洲的凯尔特人-世界史-历史分区-搜狐社区
不看欧洲历史不知道什么才是真正的卖国
汉武帝不经意改写欧洲历史 北匈奴灭亡西罗马
中国历史朝代和欧洲历史朝代对应表
欧洲反犹主义的历史透析和近期回潮
欧洲历史的传奇之三十年战争(1) :: 文化历史博客
【历史】改变欧洲历史的两个中国皇帝 - 精华知识 - 搜搜问问