XSS (Cross Site Scripting) Cheat Sheet
来源:百度文库 编辑:神马文学网 时间:2024/04/28 04:48:50
Esp: for filter evasion
ByRSnake
Note from the author: XSS is Cross Site Scripting. If you don‘t know how XSS (Cross Site Scripting) works, this page probably won‘t help you. This page is for people who already understand the basics of XSS attacks but want a deep understanding of the nuances regarding filter evasion. This page will also not show you how to mitigate XSS vectors or how to write the actual cookie/credential stealing/replay/session riding portion of the attack. It will simply show the underlying methodology and you can infer the rest. Also, please note my XSS page has been replicated by theOWASP 2.0 Guide in the Appendix section with my permission. However, because this is a living document I suggest you continue to use this site to stay up to date.
Also, please note that most of these cross site scripting vectors have been tested in the browsers listed at the bottom of the page, however, if you have specific concerns about outdated or obscure versions please download them fromEvolt. Please see theXML format of the XSS Cheat Sheet if you intend to useCAL9000 or other automated tools. If you have an RSS reader feel free to subscribe to the Web Application Security RSS feed below, or join theforum:
XSS (Cross Site Scripting): . Inject this string, and in most cases where a script is vulnerable with no special XSS vector requirements the word "XSS" will pop up. Use theURL encoding calculator below to encode the entire string. Tip: if you‘re in a rush and need to quickly check a page, often times injecting the depreciated "" tag will be enough to check to see if something is vulnerable to XSS by messing up the output appreciably:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. If you don‘t have much space and know there is no vulnerable JavaScript on the page, this string is a nice compact XSS injection check. View source after injecting it and look forBrowser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. This is a normal XSS JavaScript injection, and most likely to get caught but I suggest trying it first (the quotes are not required in any modern browser so they are omitted here):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
using the JavaScript directive (IE7.0 doesn‘t support the JavaScript directive in context of an image, but it does in other contexts, but the following show the principles that would work in other tags as well - I‘ll probably revise this at a later date):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
XSS attack vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
(the semicolons are required for this to work):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
obfuscation (If you need to use both double and single quotes you can use a grave accent to encapsulate the JavaScript string - this is also useful because lots of cross site scripting filters don‘t know about grave accents):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. Originally found byBegeek (but cleaned up and shortened to work in all browsers), this XSS vector uses the relaxed rendering engine to create our XSS vector within an IMG tag that should be encapsulated within quotes. I assume this was originally meant to correct sloppy coding. This would make it significantly more difficult to correctly parse apart an HTML tag:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
(if no quotes of any kind are allowed you can eval() a fromCharCode in JavaScript to create any XSS vector you need):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
encoding (all of the XSS examples that use a javascript: directive inside of an Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
encoding without semicolons (this is often effective in XSS that attempts to look for "X;", since most people don‘t know about padding - up to 7 numeric characters total). This is also useful against people who decode against strings like $tmp_string =~ s/.*\(\d+);.*/$1/; which incorrectly assumes a semicolon is required to terminate a html encoded string (I‘ve seen this in the wild):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
without semicolons (this is also a viable XSS attack against the above string $tmp_string =~ s/.*\(\d+);.*/$1/; which assumes that there is a numeric character following the pound symbol - which is not true with hex HTML characters). Use theXSS calculator for more information:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up the cross site scripting attack:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up XSS. For some reason Opera does not allow the encoded tab, but it does allow the previous tab XSS and encoded newline and carriage returns below:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up XSS. Some websites claim that any of the chars 09-13 (decimal) will work for this attack. That is incorrect. Only 09 (horizontal tab), 10 (newline) and 13 (carriage return) work. See theascii chart for more details. The following four XSS examples illustrate this vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up XSS (Note: with the above I am making these strings longer than they have to be because the zeros could be omitted. Often I‘ve seen filters that assume the hex and dec encoding has to be two or three characters. The real rule is 1-7 characters.):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
Injected JavaScript using ASCII carriage returns (same as above only a more extreme example of this XSS vector) these are not spaces just one of the three characters as described above:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
breaks up JavaScript directive. Okay, I lied, null chars also work as XSS vectors but not like above, you need to inject them directly using something likeBurp Proxy or use %00 in the URL string or if you want to write your own injection tool you can either usevim (^V^@ will produce a null) or the following program to generate it into a text file. Okay, I lied again, older versions of Opera (circa 7.11 on Windows) were vulnerable to one additional char 173 (the soft hypen control char). But the null char %00 is much more useful and helped me bypass certain real world filters with a variation on this example:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
breaks up cross site scripting vector. Here is a little known XSS attack vector using null characters. You can actually break up the HTML itself using the same nulls as shown above. I‘ve seen this vector bypass some of the most restrictive XSS filters to date:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
before the JavaScript in images for XSS (this is useful if the pattern match doesn‘t take into account spaces in the word "javascript:" -which is correct since that won‘t render- and makes the false assumption that you can‘t have a space between the quote and the "javascript:" keyword. The actual reality is you can have any char from 1-32 in decimal):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
XSS. While I was reading the Firefox HTML parser I found that it assumes a non-alpha-non-digit is not valid after an HTML keyword and therefor considers it to be a whitespace or non-valid token after an HTML tag. The problem is that some XSS filters assume that the tag they are looking for is broken up by whitespace. For example "" portion of this Cross Site Scripting vector. Firefox assumes it‘s safe to close the HTML tag and add closing tags for you. How thoughtful! Unlike the next one, which doesn‘t effect Firefox, this does not require any additional HTML below it. You can add quotes if you need to, but they‘re not needed generally, although beware, I have no idea what the HTML will end up looking like once this is injected:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. This particular variant was submitted by?ukasz Pilorz and was based partially off of Ozh‘s protocol resolution bypass below. This cross site scripting example works in IE, Netscape in IE rendering mode and Opera if you add in a tag at the end. However, this is especially useful where space is an issue, and of course, the shorter your domain, the better. The ".j" is valid, regardless of the MIME type because the browser knows it in context of a SCRIPT tag.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
HTML/JavaScript XSS vector. Unlike Firefox the IE rendering engine doesn‘t add extra data to your page, but it does allow the javascript: directive in images. This is useful as a vector because it doesn‘t require a close angle bracket. This assumes there is any HTML tag below where you are injecting this cross site scripting vector. Even though there is no close ">" tag the tags below it will close it. A note: this does mess up the HTML, depending on what HTML is beneath it. It gets aroundthe following NIDS regex: /((\%3D)|(=))[^\n]*((\%3C)|<)[^\n]+((\%3E)|>)/ because it doesn‘t require the end ">". As a side note, this was also affective against a real world XSS filter I came across using an open ended
ByRSnake
Note from the author: XSS is Cross Site Scripting. If you don‘t know how XSS (Cross Site Scripting) works, this page probably won‘t help you. This page is for people who already understand the basics of XSS attacks but want a deep understanding of the nuances regarding filter evasion. This page will also not show you how to mitigate XSS vectors or how to write the actual cookie/credential stealing/replay/session riding portion of the attack. It will simply show the underlying methodology and you can infer the rest. Also, please note my XSS page has been replicated by theOWASP 2.0 Guide in the Appendix section with my permission. However, because this is a living document I suggest you continue to use this site to stay up to date.
Also, please note that most of these cross site scripting vectors have been tested in the browsers listed at the bottom of the page, however, if you have specific concerns about outdated or obscure versions please download them fromEvolt. Please see theXML format of the XSS Cheat Sheet if you intend to useCAL9000 or other automated tools. If you have an RSS reader feel free to subscribe to the Web Application Security RSS feed below, or join theforum:
XSS (Cross Site Scripting): . Inject this string, and in most cases where a script is vulnerable with no special XSS vector requirements the word "XSS" will pop up. Use theURL encoding calculator below to encode the entire string. Tip: if you‘re in a rush and need to quickly check a page, often times injecting the depreciated "
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. If you don‘t have much space and know there is no vulnerable JavaScript on the page, this string is a nice compact XSS injection check. View source after injecting it and look for
. This is a normal XSS JavaScript injection, and most likely to get caught but I suggest trying it first (the quotes are not required in any modern browser so they are omitted here):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
using the JavaScript directive (IE7.0 doesn‘t support the JavaScript directive in context of an image, but it does in other contexts, but the following show the principles that would work in other tags as well - I‘ll probably revise this at a later date):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
XSS attack vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
(the semicolons are required for this to work):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
obfuscation (If you need to use both double and single quotes you can use a grave accent to encapsulate the JavaScript string - this is also useful because lots of cross site scripting filters don‘t know about grave accents):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. Originally found byBegeek (but cleaned up and shortened to work in all browsers), this XSS vector uses the relaxed rendering engine to create our XSS vector within an IMG tag that should be encapsulated within quotes. I assume this was originally meant to correct sloppy coding. This would make it significantly more difficult to correctly parse apart an HTML tag:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
(if no quotes of any kind are allowed you can eval() a fromCharCode in JavaScript to create any XSS vector you need):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
encoding (all of the XSS examples that use a javascript: directive inside of an Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
encoding without semicolons (this is often effective in XSS that attempts to look for "X;", since most people don‘t know about padding - up to 7 numeric characters total). This is also useful against people who decode against strings like $tmp_string =~ s/.*\(\d+);.*/$1/; which incorrectly assumes a semicolon is required to terminate a html encoded string (I‘ve seen this in the wild):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
without semicolons (this is also a viable XSS attack against the above string $tmp_string =~ s/.*\(\d+);.*/$1/; which assumes that there is a numeric character following the pound symbol - which is not true with hex HTML characters). Use theXSS calculator for more information:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up the cross site scripting attack:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up XSS. For some reason Opera does not allow the encoded tab, but it does allow the previous tab XSS and encoded newline and carriage returns below:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up XSS. Some websites claim that any of the chars 09-13 (decimal) will work for this attack. That is incorrect. Only 09 (horizontal tab), 10 (newline) and 13 (carriage return) work. See theascii chart for more details. The following four XSS examples illustrate this vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
to break up XSS (Note: with the above I am making these strings longer than they have to be because the zeros could be omitted. Often I‘ve seen filters that assume the hex and dec encoding has to be two or three characters. The real rule is 1-7 characters.):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
Injected JavaScript using ASCII carriage returns (same as above only a more extreme example of this XSS vector) these are not spaces just one of the three characters as described above:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
breaks up JavaScript directive. Okay, I lied, null chars also work as XSS vectors but not like above, you need to inject them directly using something likeBurp Proxy or use %00 in the URL string or if you want to write your own injection tool you can either usevim (^V^@ will produce a null) or the following program to generate it into a text file. Okay, I lied again, older versions of Opera (circa 7.11 on Windows) were vulnerable to one additional char 173 (the soft hypen control char). But the null char %00 is much more useful and helped me bypass certain real world filters with a variation on this example:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
breaks up cross site scripting vector. Here is a little known XSS attack vector using null characters. You can actually break up the HTML itself using the same nulls as shown above. I‘ve seen this vector bypass some of the most restrictive XSS filters to date:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
before the JavaScript in images for XSS (this is useful if the pattern match doesn‘t take into account spaces in the word "javascript:" -which is correct since that won‘t render- and makes the false assumption that you can‘t have a space between the quote and the "javascript:" keyword. The actual reality is you can have any char from 1-32 in decimal):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
XSS. While I was reading the Firefox HTML parser I found that it assumes a non-alpha-non-digit is not valid after an HTML keyword and therefor considers it to be a whitespace or non-valid token after an HTML tag. The problem is that some XSS filters assume that the tag they are looking for is broken up by whitespace. For example "" portion of this Cross Site Scripting vector. Firefox assumes it‘s safe to close the HTML tag and add closing tags for you. How thoughtful! Unlike the next one, which doesn‘t effect Firefox, this does not require any additional HTML below it. You can add quotes if you need to, but they‘re not needed generally, although beware, I have no idea what the HTML will end up looking like once this is injected:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
. This particular variant was submitted by?ukasz Pilorz and was based partially off of Ozh‘s protocol resolution bypass below. This cross site scripting example works in IE, Netscape in IE rendering mode and Opera if you add in a tag at the end. However, this is especially useful where space is an issue, and of course, the shorter your domain, the better. The ".j" is valid, regardless of the MIME type because the browser knows it in context of a SCRIPT tag.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF1.5] [O8.54]
HTML/JavaScript XSS vector. Unlike Firefox the IE rendering engine doesn‘t add extra data to your page, but it does allow the javascript: directive in images. This is useful as a vector because it doesn‘t require a close angle bracket. This assumes there is any HTML tag below where you are injecting this cross site scripting vector. Even though there is no close ">" tag the tags below it will close it. A note: this does mess up the HTML, depending on what HTML is beneath it. It gets aroundthe following NIDS regex: /((\%3D)|(=))[^\n]*((\%3C)|<)[^\n]+((\%3E)|>)/ because it doesn‘t require the end ">". As a side note, this was also affective against a real world XSS filter I came across using an open ended