illegal-art.org :: a project of Stay Free! magazine

AD


Illegal Art: Freedom of Expression in the Corporate Age
* * *
Update 9/14/05: All video files are currently not working, due to a massive meltdown at our ISP. We have moved to a new web host and hope to have everything back online in a few weeks.
The Illegal Art Exhibit will resume traveling in 2006. Look for the exhibit inHollywood, Florida and Portland, Oregon. (Our scheduled date in Los Angeles has unfortunately been canceled.) Anyone interested in hosting the show in another city -- and able to cover its expenses -- kindlyget in touch. We‘re also looking for donors to support our work, which you can read abouthere.
* * *
Available now:
Illegal Art DVD-R including Todd Haynes‘ Superstar: the Karen Carpenter Story and ten shorts.
Wizard People, Dear Reader
Brad Neely‘s re-interpretation of the first Harry Potter movie Illegal Art issue (#20) ofStay Free! magazine + Illegal Art CDsavailable here.
Also, check out our new blog,Stay Free! Daily, focused on American media and culture, including intellectual property issues.
* * *
Good news! Tom Forsythe, has won a major victory in his case against Mattel. Mattel, you may recall, sued Forsythe over hisFood Chain Barbie photographs; Forsythe won in federal discourt court, then again in circuit court. Now the district court has gone the extra mile. Calling Mattel‘s case "objectively unreasonable" and "frivolous," the court has ruled that Mattel must pay Forsythe‘s team over $1.8 million to cover legal fees and court costs!
Major congrats to Tom and his (until now) pro-bono lawyers... but perhaps the real winners are the rest of us. This case sets a precedent, and, with luck, it‘ll discourage corporations from using copyright law to make frivolous cases against artists. |Read the court decision
* * *
EMI OUTLAWS "GREY ALBUM" Find out more anddownload the Grey Album here.
* * *
The laws governing "intellectual property" have grown so expansive in recent years that artists need legal experts to sort them all out. Borrowing from another artwork--as jazz musicians did in the 1930s and Looney Tunes illustrators did in 1940s--will now land you in court. If the current copyright laws had been in effect back in the day, whole genres such as collage, hiphop, and Pop Art might have never have existed.
The irony here couldn‘t be more stark. Rooted in the U.S. Constitution, copyright was originally intended to facilitate the exchange of ideas but is now being used to stifle it.
The Illegal Art Exhibit will celebrate what is rapidly becoming the "degenerate art" of a corporate age: art and ideas on the legal fringes of intellectual property. Some of the pieces in the show have eluded lawyers; others have had to appear in court.
Loaded with gray areas, intellectual property law inevitably has a silencing effect, discouraging the creation of new works.
Should artists be allowed to use copyrighted materials? Where do the First Amendment and "intellectual property" law collide? What is art‘s future if the current laws are allowed to stand?Stay Free! considers these questions and others in our multimedia program. --Carrie McLaren
* * *
For in-depth information about copyright law and its impact on free expression, please see the new "copyright" issue ofStay Free! magazine, which includes the Illegal Art Catalog and will be available at all exhibit events. See alsoArticles andIllegal Art Links.

Illegal Art is sponsored byBrooklyn-basedStay Free! magazine, with support from theOnline Policy Group, a nonprofit ISP devoted to free speech, andPrelinger Archives.









Illegal Art logo adapted fromAmerican Alphabet, by Heidi Cody
created 2002 ::Contact us :: a project ofStay Free!
_xyz