神马文学网文革图书摘要
来源：百度文库 编辑：神马文学网 时间：2024/04/28 10:24:36
首页>>图书资料>>图书室>>图书介绍>>图书摘要
来源：中国选举与治理网资料室
文化大革命新论
威廉·A·约瑟夫、克里斯丁·P·W·王、大卫·茨威格 主编
1991年
在“四人帮”被捕近15年后，本书对文化大革命进行了批评性的、多学科的评估。本书所收录的文章大体上都研究了“理想与现实间影响深远的鸿沟”这一主题，即文化大革命中所提出的极左目标及其现实结果与具体遗产之间的关系。安德鲁·沃德把文化大革命的原动力归结于对“社会主义的敌人”的一种偏执的狂想，而林恩·怀特三世则把这个运动看作是先前已存在的社会情形的自然继续。本书作者们都认为文革的基础是一种拙劣的构想，沃德、克里斯丁·P·W·王、巴里·诺顿都通过实例揭示了文化大革命的意识形态系统自身内生的矛盾。对于文化大革命的影响，本文集几乎一致持批判态度，只有佩内罗普·普莱姆认为中央与地方的关系在江苏导致了生产的成就。一些文章利用最新的可用数据、叙述年表和官方或个人的记录，从政策和经济角度指出了“三线工程”的错误与失败。文化大革命对政治和文化产生的消极影响也在一些文章中被讨论，如大卫·茨威格认为在运动中农民事实上处于最不利的地位，肯尼思·佛斯特认为这个时期的政治不允许把权力移交给农民但却繁衍出了宗派之争，而理查德·克劳斯则注意到了由这个政权的文艺政策所导致的“文化饥荒”。艾伦·R·贾德和理查德·金则从人类学和文学的角度进行了探讨。
约瑟夫在卫斯理学院教政治学。之前作过世界银行高级经济学家的王，现在是华盛顿大学国际关系方面的亨利·M·杰克逊教授。茨威格现在是香港科技大学人文和社会科学学院副院长，同时也是该校中国跨国关系研究中心主任。
New Perspectives on the Cultural Revolution
ed. William A. Joseph, Christine P.W. Wong, and David Zweig
1991
This volume offers a critical, multidisciplinary assessment of the Cultural Revolution, almost 15 years after the arrest of the Gang of Four. Its articles generally investigate "the profound gap between ideal and reality" – that is, between the stated ultraleftist goals of the Cultural Revolution as well as its actual outcomes and concrete legacy. Andrew Walder attributes the impetus behind the Cultural Revolution to a paranoia concerning the "enemies of socialism," while Lynn T. White III sees the movement as a natural continuation of preexisting conditions. The authors agree that its foundations were ill-conceived; Walder, Christine P.W. Wong, and Barry Naughton, for instance, all address the contradictions endogenous to the Cultural Revolution system of ideology. This collection's analyses of the impact of the Cultural Revolution are almost uniformly critical; only Penelope B. Prime argues that central-local relations led to production successes in Jiangsu province. Using newly available statistics, descriptive chronologies, and official and personal accounts, several articles point out the failures of the Third Front from policy and economic perspectives. The negative political and cultural ramifications of the Cultural Revolution are also treated in many of the articles, by authors such as David Zweig (who points out that peasants were, in reality, most disadvantaged in the movement), Keith Forster (who argues that the era's politics did not allow power to devolve to peasants but bred factionalism instead), and Richard Kraus (who looks at the "cultural famine" produced by the regime's arts policy). Ellen R. Judd and Richard King bring anthropological and literary viewpoints.
Joseph teaches political science at Wellesley College. After serving as a senior economist at the World Bank, Wong is now the Henry M. Jackson Professor of International Studies at the University of Washington. Zweig currently serves as Director of the Center on China's Transnational Relations and as Associate Dean of the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, both at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
文化大革命和后毛时代的改革 邹谠
1986年
邹在本书所收录的论文里运用了社会科学的多种方法——包括系统分析法和理性选择理论——以政治科学的理论框架来分析中国最近发生的历史中的重大事件。他特别感兴趣的是意识形态和政治发展之间的相互影响，但他指出意识形态并不是影响“20世纪中国复杂的社会政治发展过程及其结果”的唯一因素。为支持这个观点，他的文章——每篇都以一个特定历史事件作为其论述的出发点——不仅考察了意识形态（不论来源于国内还是国外），而且考察了历史传统、国家与社会关系、政权类型与组织机构、马克思主义在中国的不同“阶段”及其他一些因素。最后，邹的书还承担起了一个令人畏缩的任务，即描述“后毛时代国家重建的持续过程以及党－国体制的改革”。
邹谠是芝加哥大学霍默·J·利文斯顿政治学荣誉退休教授。其代表作还有《美国在中国的失败：1941－1950》、《20世纪中国政治：宏观历史和微观结构视角分析》。邹谠教授于1999年去世。
Cultural Revolution and Post-Mao Reforms
Tang Tsou
1986
Tsou's essays in this book apply methods from social science – including systems analysis and rational-choice theory – to analysis of specific events in China's recent history, based on theoretical political science frameworks. He is particularly interested in the interplay between ideology and political development, but he points out that ideology is not the only factor influencing "the complex process of sociopolitical development in 20th-c. China, together with its outcomes." To that end, his essays – all of which have a specific event as their point of departure – examine not only ideology (whether foreign or domestic in origin) but also historical tradition, the state-society relationship, regime type and organization, different "phases" of Marxism in China, and other factors. Ultimately, Tsou's book takes on the daunting task of characterizing the "continuing process of rebuilding the state and reforming the party-state in the post-Mao period."
Tang Tsou was Homer J. Livingston Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago. His other books include America’s Failure in China: 1941-1950 and Twentieth Century Chinese Politics: From the Perspectives of Macro-history and Micromechanism Analysis. He passed away in 1999.
政策混乱：文化大革命中暴力现象的组织原因
Lynn T. White
在本书中，作者White以上海作为案例进行研究，以解释文化大革命时期暴力以及下放产生的政策原因。作者对文化大革命时期中国城市居民暴力化的理论见解极具原创性，给人启发。
Lynn T. White是普林斯顿大学政治学、东亚研究教授，同时任教于威尔逊学院。他还是《世界政治》杂志的编辑。
Policies of Chaos: The Organizational Causes of Violence in China's Cultural Revolution
Lynn T. White
In this book, White uses the city of Shanghai as a case study for understanding what policies were responsible for the violence and ostracism that erupted in the Cultural Revolution. An extremely exciting piece of scholarship, White's theoretical insights about why the Chinese urban people became so violent with each other during the Cultural Revolution are truly original and sound.
Lynn T. White is a professor at Princeton University in Politics, East Asian Studies, and the Woodrow Wilson School. He has been an editor of the journal World Politics.
来源：中国选举与治理网资料室
来源：中国选举与治理网资料室
文化大革命新论
威廉·A·约瑟夫、克里斯丁·P·W·王、大卫·茨威格 主编
1991年
在“四人帮”被捕近15年后，本书对文化大革命进行了批评性的、多学科的评估。本书所收录的文章大体上都研究了“理想与现实间影响深远的鸿沟”这一主题，即文化大革命中所提出的极左目标及其现实结果与具体遗产之间的关系。安德鲁·沃德把文化大革命的原动力归结于对“社会主义的敌人”的一种偏执的狂想，而林恩·怀特三世则把这个运动看作是先前已存在的社会情形的自然继续。本书作者们都认为文革的基础是一种拙劣的构想，沃德、克里斯丁·P·W·王、巴里·诺顿都通过实例揭示了文化大革命的意识形态系统自身内生的矛盾。对于文化大革命的影响，本文集几乎一致持批判态度，只有佩内罗普·普莱姆认为中央与地方的关系在江苏导致了生产的成就。一些文章利用最新的可用数据、叙述年表和官方或个人的记录，从政策和经济角度指出了“三线工程”的错误与失败。文化大革命对政治和文化产生的消极影响也在一些文章中被讨论，如大卫·茨威格认为在运动中农民事实上处于最不利的地位，肯尼思·佛斯特认为这个时期的政治不允许把权力移交给农民但却繁衍出了宗派之争，而理查德·克劳斯则注意到了由这个政权的文艺政策所导致的“文化饥荒”。艾伦·R·贾德和理查德·金则从人类学和文学的角度进行了探讨。
约瑟夫在卫斯理学院教政治学。之前作过世界银行高级经济学家的王，现在是华盛顿大学国际关系方面的亨利·M·杰克逊教授。茨威格现在是香港科技大学人文和社会科学学院副院长，同时也是该校中国跨国关系研究中心主任。
New Perspectives on the Cultural Revolution
ed. William A. Joseph, Christine P.W. Wong, and David Zweig
1991
This volume offers a critical, multidisciplinary assessment of the Cultural Revolution, almost 15 years after the arrest of the Gang of Four. Its articles generally investigate "the profound gap between ideal and reality" – that is, between the stated ultraleftist goals of the Cultural Revolution as well as its actual outcomes and concrete legacy. Andrew Walder attributes the impetus behind the Cultural Revolution to a paranoia concerning the "enemies of socialism," while Lynn T. White III sees the movement as a natural continuation of preexisting conditions. The authors agree that its foundations were ill-conceived; Walder, Christine P.W. Wong, and Barry Naughton, for instance, all address the contradictions endogenous to the Cultural Revolution system of ideology. This collection's analyses of the impact of the Cultural Revolution are almost uniformly critical; only Penelope B. Prime argues that central-local relations led to production successes in Jiangsu province. Using newly available statistics, descriptive chronologies, and official and personal accounts, several articles point out the failures of the Third Front from policy and economic perspectives. The negative political and cultural ramifications of the Cultural Revolution are also treated in many of the articles, by authors such as David Zweig (who points out that peasants were, in reality, most disadvantaged in the movement), Keith Forster (who argues that the era's politics did not allow power to devolve to peasants but bred factionalism instead), and Richard Kraus (who looks at the "cultural famine" produced by the regime's arts policy). Ellen R. Judd and Richard King bring anthropological and literary viewpoints.
Joseph teaches political science at Wellesley College. After serving as a senior economist at the World Bank, Wong is now the Henry M. Jackson Professor of International Studies at the University of Washington. Zweig currently serves as Director of the Center on China's Transnational Relations and as Associate Dean of the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, both at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
文化大革命和后毛时代的改革 邹谠
1986年
邹在本书所收录的论文里运用了社会科学的多种方法——包括系统分析法和理性选择理论——以政治科学的理论框架来分析中国最近发生的历史中的重大事件。他特别感兴趣的是意识形态和政治发展之间的相互影响，但他指出意识形态并不是影响“20世纪中国复杂的社会政治发展过程及其结果”的唯一因素。为支持这个观点，他的文章——每篇都以一个特定历史事件作为其论述的出发点——不仅考察了意识形态（不论来源于国内还是国外），而且考察了历史传统、国家与社会关系、政权类型与组织机构、马克思主义在中国的不同“阶段”及其他一些因素。最后，邹的书还承担起了一个令人畏缩的任务，即描述“后毛时代国家重建的持续过程以及党－国体制的改革”。
邹谠是芝加哥大学霍默·J·利文斯顿政治学荣誉退休教授。其代表作还有《美国在中国的失败：1941－1950》、《20世纪中国政治：宏观历史和微观结构视角分析》。邹谠教授于1999年去世。
Cultural Revolution and Post-Mao Reforms
Tang Tsou
1986
Tsou's essays in this book apply methods from social science – including systems analysis and rational-choice theory – to analysis of specific events in China's recent history, based on theoretical political science frameworks. He is particularly interested in the interplay between ideology and political development, but he points out that ideology is not the only factor influencing "the complex process of sociopolitical development in 20th-c. China, together with its outcomes." To that end, his essays – all of which have a specific event as their point of departure – examine not only ideology (whether foreign or domestic in origin) but also historical tradition, the state-society relationship, regime type and organization, different "phases" of Marxism in China, and other factors. Ultimately, Tsou's book takes on the daunting task of characterizing the "continuing process of rebuilding the state and reforming the party-state in the post-Mao period."
Tang Tsou was Homer J. Livingston Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago. His other books include America’s Failure in China: 1941-1950 and Twentieth Century Chinese Politics: From the Perspectives of Macro-history and Micromechanism Analysis. He passed away in 1999.
政策混乱：文化大革命中暴力现象的组织原因
Lynn T. White
在本书中，作者White以上海作为案例进行研究，以解释文化大革命时期暴力以及下放产生的政策原因。作者对文化大革命时期中国城市居民暴力化的理论见解极具原创性，给人启发。
Lynn T. White是普林斯顿大学政治学、东亚研究教授，同时任教于威尔逊学院。他还是《世界政治》杂志的编辑。
Policies of Chaos: The Organizational Causes of Violence in China's Cultural Revolution
Lynn T. White
In this book, White uses the city of Shanghai as a case study for understanding what policies were responsible for the violence and ostracism that erupted in the Cultural Revolution. An extremely exciting piece of scholarship, White's theoretical insights about why the Chinese urban people became so violent with each other during the Cultural Revolution are truly original and sound.
Lynn T. White is a professor at Princeton University in Politics, East Asian Studies, and the Woodrow Wilson School. He has been an editor of the journal World Politics.
来源：中国选举与治理网资料室