神马文学网中国XML论坛--RDF与XML的区别是什么(补充)?
来源：百度文库 编辑：神马文学网 时间：2024/04/29 01:40:58
继续补充：RDF 相比于XML的一个很大的有点是它的语法自由，它不像XML有个XML Schema来约束它的语法，这使得RDF具有良好得互操作性。
It‘s best to tend to think of RDF as what it is: another language, just as SVG is, rather than viewing it simply as XML surrounded in rdf:RDF tags.
With XML, you expect to get a tree with its elements in a predictable order. If an expected element is missing, then it tends to render your whole XML document invalid with respect to the schema you are using. If an element you don‘t expect to be there is present, then again your document becomes invalid. With RDF, you have no particular expectations; if the particular strand of spaghetti you‘re looking for isn‘t there, the rest of the ball remains. If there are new strands you don‘t expect, you won‘t even notice their presence if you don‘t go looking for them.
The big advantage of being failure-friendly is the enhancement of interoperability. Consider what happens if you add a new property to your description of my weblog and it becomes like this:
‘>http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog">
Behind the times
10
My "find the title" processor can still deal with your description just fine, as all it cares about is the dc:title property. All RDF processors are automatically future compatible, and all RDF descriptions are automatically backwards compatible. This is a huge benefit over traditional XML processing.
参考：
【1】 Edd Dumbill Sticking with it -- RDF http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2003/08/08-whyrdf/read
【2】 Missing isn‘t broken: data validation and freedom on the Semantic Web http://rdfweb.org/mt/foaflog/archives/000047.html
It‘s best to tend to think of RDF as what it is: another language, just as SVG is, rather than viewing it simply as XML surrounded in rdf:RDF tags.
With XML, you expect to get a tree with its elements in a predictable order. If an expected element is missing, then it tends to render your whole XML document invalid with respect to the schema you are using. If an element you don‘t expect to be there is present, then again your document becomes invalid. With RDF, you have no particular expectations; if the particular strand of spaghetti you‘re looking for isn‘t there, the rest of the ball remains. If there are new strands you don‘t expect, you won‘t even notice their presence if you don‘t go looking for them.
The big advantage of being failure-friendly is the enhancement of interoperability. Consider what happens if you add a new property to your description of my weblog and it becomes like this:
My "find the title" processor can still deal with your description just fine, as all it cares about is the dc:title property. All RDF processors are automatically future compatible, and all RDF descriptions are automatically backwards compatible. This is a huge benefit over traditional XML processing.
参考：
【1】 Edd Dumbill Sticking with it -- RDF http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2003/08/08-whyrdf/read
【2】 Missing isn‘t broken: data validation and freedom on the Semantic Web http://rdfweb.org/mt/foaflog/archives/000047.html
中国XML论坛--RDF与XML的区别是什么(补充)?
中国XML论坛--RDF与XML的区别是什么?
中国XML论坛--RDF与XML的区别是什么?
RDF和XML区别
中国XML论坛--利用VC++与MSXML解析XML文档
html、xhtml与xml的区别
JS-RDF: XML Parser tests
XML和数据库的区别
XML是什么,讲述XML基础知识
XML是什么,讲述XML基础知识
中国XML论坛--资料下载
XML 论坛
XML 观察: 使用 XML 和 RDF 找到朋友
XML 观察: 使用 XML 和 RDF 找到朋友
中国XML论坛 - 专业的XML技术讨论区--中文VoiceXML语音浏览器白皮书
xml
JSP与XML的结合
JSP与XML的结合
中国XML论坛--名域问题详解!
XML安全：使用SAML确保可移植的信任 - XML与XML Schema - TT SO...
中国XML论坛 - 专业的XML技术讨论区--贴心实用，推荐一小巧UML建模工具
hyde82的专栏 - XML与XSL应用
JSP与XML的结合2
JSP与XML的结合(1)