奥巴马:中国人富裕了就是世界的灾难!

来源:百度文库 编辑:神马文学网 时间:2024/04/26 05:55:16

http://www.tudou.com/v/Wg5pN8GJPhA/v.swf

奥巴马:中国人富裕了就是世界的灾难!

中国李建军100805转评)

http://blog.163.com/happy_sb/blog/static/185631912010725101655847/

http://happyzzzzz.blog.sohu.com/158595731.html

http://portal.sinoth.com/happyzz/1000065252.html

http://blog.myspace.cn/e/407860030.htm

http://www.dfbx365.com/viewthread.php?tid=41157

http://blog.renren.com/blog/248203383/482047716

http://bbs.chnqiang.com/viewthread.php?tid=211979

2010 年 4月14 日,奥巴马通过电视镜头向全世界明确宣布:

如果10多亿中国人口也过上与美国和澳大利亚同样的生活,那将是人类的悲剧和灾难,地球根本承受不了,全世界将陷入非常悲惨的境地。美国并不想限制中国的发展,但中国在发展的时候要承担起国际上的责任。中国人要富裕起来可以,但中国领导人应该想出一个新模式,不要让地球无法承担。

博客视频:

http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/Wg5pN8GJPhA/

http://www.tudou.com/v/Wg5pN8GJPhA/v.swf

 

参考英文

OBRIEN:

DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU ARE MAKING HEADWAY WITH PRESIDENT HU ON THIS FRONT?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:

Well you know I think China has an enormous interest in solving this problem. You know if you talk to Chinese leaders I think they will acknowledge immediately that if over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now then all of us are in for a very miserable time, the planet just cant sustain it, so they understand that theyve got to make a decision about a new model that is more sustainable that allows them to pursue the economic growth that theyre pursuing while at the same time dealing with these environmental consequences. So I think they understand intellectually. Right now though theyre understandable impulse is to say well lets let the developed countries, the Australias, and the Americas deal with this problem first and well get to it when weve caught up a little bit in terms of our standard of living. The point weve tried to make is we cant, we cant allow China to wait. We have to take responsibility and do what needs to be done, but if emerging countries not just China but also India, Brazil and others are pursuing a path in which they replace us as the largest carbon emitters, thats not a sustainable practical approach, so were going to have to have everybody moving on the same track at the same time.